Contemporary artists continue to make art that challenges how we define art and that encourages us to reflect on our own role in meaning-making. Many of these works de-emphasize the technical skill of the artist, placing the audience’s focus on the underlying philosophical and political structures that create “art”. Such works can provide unique opportunities for students to engage in critical thinking and debate about art, its meaning and its value in contemporary society.
Throughout history artists have sought to challenge our concept of what art can be. When Marcel Duchamp introduced the concept of ‘readymade’A form of sculpture pioneered by Marcel Duchamp in 1913, when he exhibited found objects as artworks he invited conversation about the role of the artist, the institution and the viewer in meaning-making. Duchamp’s sculptural series of found objects asserted that it’s the artist who defines what an artwork is; that the act of choosing an object, removing it from its functional context and placing it in a gallery turns it into art. Later conceptual art Art in which ideas or concepts are more important than the art object. Conceptual Art emerged in the 1960s in the United States. Conceptual artists often focus on ideas about art itself and challenge traditions by using non-conventional art materials., including artists like Joseph Kosuth, Yoko Ono and Sol LeWitt, challenged accepted notions of the form and function of art. Similarly, artists associated with Pop Art such as Andy Warhol challenged traditional ideas about art through subject matter and techniques taken from popular culture including advertising, movies and comic books.
Maurizio Cattelan, Comedian, 2019
Maurizio Cattelan is a highly popular (and controversial) artist working in sculpture, installation, curation and publishing. His works are often humorous, challenging audiences to debate about art and its value in contemporary society. His work Comedian, 2019 became a viral phenomenon after it premiered at Art Basel Miami Beach. Several ‘versions’ of the work – a banana duct taped to a wall – were bought for $120,000–$150,000 USD and generated significant public interest and intense debate. Interestingly, the artwork here both an object, and an idea.
When a gallery purchases the artwork, they buy a certificate of authenticity, rights to present the piece as an artwork by Maurizio Cattelan, and instructions on how to correctly install and display it. The NGV has loaned this work, meaning that the Gallery hasn’t bought the work but is borrowing it from another. Through this piece Cattelan poses questions about value, and‘turns the art form against itself…(toying) with the fraught nature of spectatorship for contemporary art…’.
By using readily available materials and a simple method of display, Cattelan has created a work that arguably could be made by anyone—making it a perfect site to debate how we recognise works of art and value them. Further, the audience discussion, debate and response could also be said to be a part of the artwork itself, turning naysayers into participants in a broader commentary on both the art world and contemporary society itself.
Smac McCreanor, Hydraulic girl press, 2020–
Hydraulic press girl, 2020–, is a body of work created as digital content by Brisbane-born contemporary dancer, choreographer and artist Smac McCreanor. This series takes the form of “reaction videos”, a subgenre of digital content popular on social media platforms. In side-by-side frames, McCreanor’s body recreates and reacts to videos from YouTube’s Hydraulic Press Channel, a platform dedicated to showing various objects being crushed by a hydraulic press.
The 2023 Triennial is the first time that the work has been removed from its original context of social media and appear in a gallery. While massively popular online (with the series garnering over 700 million views on the artists’ social media accounts), the presentation of these films (originally made for mass consumption) in the Gallery setting encourages a reframing of these works.
The works may be viewed as humorous or grotesque. Audiences may be drawn to the way McCreanor uses her body to imitate the impact on the object, and simultaneously repelled by the violence of the imagery. Her work’s origin as online content invites deeper questioning and discussion about the content we create and consume and what this tells us about our culture today. Students may find this work particularly interesting as it shows some of the artistic possibilities of social media while rejecting stark boundaries about what makes something “art”. McCreanor describes online platforms as a space ‘where her authenticity, personal style and creativity is best representedSophie Prince, ‘Stop scrolling and look at the art’ NGV Triennial 2023, 79.
Experience
- List the key components of the work. These might be visual, or might incorporate movement, sound, light, or other.
- Comment on how the work has been displayed – where is it placed and what other works are nearby? How do viewers engage with the work? Is the work permanent or ephemeral?
Inquire
In pairs, generate 10 questions about the work, which might help you to understand it better. These questions might be related to what you have seen in the work. Use the following starters to help you:
- Why…?
- What are the reasons…?
- What if…?
- What is the purpose of…?
- How would it be different if…?
- Suppose that…?
- What if we knew…?
- What would change if…?
Interpret
Discuss the following ideas about art and its function with reference to the artwork(s) being discussed:
- Value – Is there such a thing as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ art? Who decides? What factors do you think might determine an artwork’s monetary value?
- The viewer – what is the role of the viewer in this work? What do you think the artists wants the viewer to think or feel when they view the work? Might they need a specific set of skills or knowledge to understand the work? Might a different person bring a different meaning to the work?
- Context and meaning – Does the work belong in a gallery? Why or why not? Where else might you find this object or work? How does its display in the Gallery affect our interpretation of its meaning?
- What is art? How do you think the artist would define ‘art’? How do you define ‘art’? Does this work challenge your idea? In what way?
Connect
- Reflect on your first response to the work – has your response changed after discussing the work in more depth?
- Did you make any personal associations or connections with the work, and do you think this might have changed how you felt about it?
- Has the work contributed to, or challenged your understanding of what art can be? What remaining questions or challenges do you have?
- Marcel Duchamp believed that a work of art is completed by the viewer.Discuss this idea in relation to one of the works.
- In what way could the artwork be considered a reflection of our times?